文章背景
“恋爱成瘾”是一个极具吸引力的话题,常被用来形容那些无法停止恋爱、即便有伴侣仍忍不住出轨的人——女性多称自己“恋爱成瘾”,男性则更倾向于“性成瘾”。但真相是,无论是恋爱成瘾还是性成瘾,都未被《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5)、世界卫生组织《国际疾病分类》(ICD-11)等权威手册列为科学认可的疾病。
人们自称“恋爱成瘾”,往往是受网络信息或不专业心理从业者影响,其背后实则是其他心理困扰。将其贴上“成瘾”标签反而有害,相关戒瘾疗法并无实证支持。约翰·鲍尔比提出的依恋理论,或许能揭开这一现象的本质:反复恋爱、出轨等行为,本质是在填补未被满足的关系需求,且多与童年经历相关。
依恋风格(安全型、回避型、焦虑型、混乱型)源于童年照料者的回应方式,童年未被满足的情感需求,会让成年人通过频繁恋爱、出轨等行为寻求慰藉。相较于将其视为“成瘾”,从依恋理论视角探索行为背后的需求,更能帮助人们看清问题根源。
值得庆幸的是,依恋风格可以改变,治愈童年关系创伤,就能改善频繁投入恋爱的状态。安全感不等于单配偶制,关键是接纳自己与他人。与其自我否定为“恋爱成瘾”,不如探索自我与他人的相处模式,才能真正实现心理成长。

1019 words【Para. 1】The theme “addicted to love” has inspired many songs and stories. Indeed, it is catchy and intriguing. Also, you might have seen stories online and in newspapers about people being "love addicts”. People who identify with “love addiction” often say that they can’t stop dating people or engaging in romantic relationships even if they already have romantic and sexual partners, and some people say that they can’t stop cheating. (Women who keep cheating tend to call themselves “love addicts” while men tend to call themselves “sex addicts".)
【Para. 2】The truth is that neither “love addiction” or “sex addiction” is scientifically endorsed as a disorder by any mental health manuals such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and the World Health Organisation's ICD-11, which means that people identifying as “love addicts” may be doing so because it is a term they came across doing online searches, or because of what they've been told by an uninformed mental health professional. In reality, though, they might be struggling with something else.
【Para. 3】The label “love addiction” is problematic because if people identify as such, they might be encouraged to attend 12-step programmes or seek addiction-oriented therapy, although none of which have evidence to support their effectiveness, and they could in fact be more harmful than helpful.
【Para. 4】However, attachment theories, first proposed by John Bowlby in the 1960’s and 70’s, may provide some clarity as to the actual struggles experienced by people who identify with “love addiction”.
【Para. 5】Rather than focusing on the behavioural aspects of frequently engaging in romantic and sexual relationships—and attempting to stop those behaviours as though they were an addiction and a disease—it may be more helpful to examine the functions of those behaviours in a person’s relational world. In other words, it is better to be curious about how those behaviours could be meeting an important relational unmet need.
【Para. 6】The unmet needs may not be the ones of the adult in the here-and-now. For example, some people who secretly engage in romantic and sexual relationships may be happy with their current partner from their adult perspectives, but there is another need, often a deep-seated one from childhood, that requires soothing in the forms of reaching out for other people romantically and sexually.
【Para. 7】Attachment theories are complex, but, to summarise them, there are several attachment styles people can have, often stemming from childhood: Secure: A secure person feels comfortable with closeness and independence, trusting others, and handling conflict or emotional needs with openness and balance. In other words, borrowing from the language of Transactional Analysis, it sounds like: “I’m OK, you’re OK”. Avoidant: An avoidant person values independence over closeness, feeling uncomfortable with emotional intimacy and often distancing themselves when relationships become too emotionally demanding. They often describe their feelings towards emotional intimacy as “suffocating”. It sounds like “I’m OK, you’re not OK”. Anxious: An anxious person has a strong desire for closeness combined with fear of abandonment, leading to heightened sensitivity to rejection and a need for frequent reassurance. It sounds like “I’m not OK, you’re OK”. Disorganised: A disorganised person feels a confusing mix of wanting closeness and fearing it, often leading to unpredictable or contradictory behaviours in relationships. It sounds like “I’m not OK, you’re not OK”.
【Para. 8】Those attachment styles emerge from how caregivers responded to the emotional needs of the child; through those early experiences, the child learns patterns of relating based on their perception of their self-worth, how secure they feel with others, and how they stand in the world. For example, a child who had one highly critical parent and one emotionally absent parent may learn that they are not worthy of warmth and care (low self-worth), and that relationships with others are often painful, making it difficult to believe that it is OK to just be oneself. They may also believe that the world is a harsh and lonely place. As a result, the child may develop an anxious or an avoidant attachment style.
【Para. 9】Looking at how people relate to their romantic and sexual relationships through the lens of attachment theories, rather than addiction narratives, can be enlightening because the thread of relating to others in one person’s life story will become clearer, and the function of the repetitive engagements in romantic and sexual relationships will become obvious within that life story. Once the story is understood, with good emotional awareness, people can begin to see how they have been soothing their relational pain of childhood, and can then change their patterns. The good news is that we can change our attachment style: Examining and healing relational wounds is effective in resolving issues of frequent engagement in romantic and sexual relationships.
【Para. 10】Becoming secure, attaining better self-worth, and feeling more comfortable in relationships (not just romantic and sexual relationships) looks different for everyone. It is important not to equate feeling secure with being comfortable with monogamy. Indeed, some secure people enjoy monogamy, but others can feel secure in open relationships, polyamory, or as a single person with multiple lovers. Being secure is feeling that you’re OK with yourself and others are OK too.
【Para. 11】It is not helpful when you berate yourself as a “love addict” or “broken”. Instead, you can ask yourself, "How do I stand on my own two feet, and how do I connect with others?”. This relational exploration is profound because it can lead you to the centre of your heart.
【声明】:本文原文摘选自 Psychology Today,原文版权归杂志所有,仅供个人学习交流使用。
如需获取外刊精读资源,加入训练营,每天都提供四份学习文档;
点链接直接查看精读训练营更多详情:
👉👉👉 外刊精读训练营

